To read the original manuscript, click the link above.
Summary of Reviews: Reviewers disagree on this preprint. One finds a major methodological flaw that makes the conclusions unreliable; the other finds the analysis general but reliable, and suggests that the findings should engage other work on the mental health consequences of the pandemic.
Reviewer 1 | 📕 ◻️◻️◻️◻️
Reviewer 2 (Rudi Rocha) | 📗📗📗📗◻️
Reviewer 3 (Tom Vogl) | 📕 ◻️◻️◻️◻️
Reviewer 4 (Nicholas Reynolds) | 📒📒📒 ◻️◻️
RR:C19 Strength of Evidence Scale Key
📕 ◻️◻️◻️◻️ = Misleading
📙📙 ◻️◻️◻️ = Not Informative
📒📒📒 ◻️◻️ = Potentially Informative
📗📗📗📗◻️ = Reliable
📘📘📘📘📘 = Strong
To read the reviews, click the links below.