Note: The Editorial Team will be posting more reviews of this preprint in the near future given the differing views of the reviewers.
To read the original manuscript, click the link above.
Summary of Reviews: Reviewers disagree on this preprint. One finds a major methodological flaw that makes the conclusions unreliable; the other finds the analysis general but reliable, and suggests that the findings should engage other work on the mental health consequences of the pandemic.
Reviewer 1 | 📕 ◻️◻️◻️◻️
Reviewer 2 (Rudi Rocha) | 📗📗📗📗◻️
RR:C19 Strength of Evidence Scale Key
📕 ◻️◻️◻️◻️ = Misleading
📙📙 ◻️◻️◻️ = Not Informative
📒📒📒 ◻️◻️ = Potentially Informative
📗📗📗📗◻️ = Reliable
📘📘📘📘📘 = Strong
To read the reviews, click the links below.